PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEM vs. VEXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEM vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GEM having a 18.38% return and VEXC slightly higher at 18.87%.


GEM

1D
-3.47%
1M
-4.39%
6M
12.13%
YTD
18.38%
1Y
35.61%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
8.54%

VEXC

1D
-1.96%
1M
0.09%
6M
14.90%
YTD
18.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEM vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GEM and VEXC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEM vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEM
GEM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VEXC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEM vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEMVEXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

GEM vs. VEXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEM vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEM drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEM and VEXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEMVEXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.02%

-12.42%

-24.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.91%

-4.77%

-4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.94%

-2.33%

-9.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

Volatility

GEM vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEMVEXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.91%

20.20%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

20.20%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

20.20%

-0.95%

GEM vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEM vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison

GEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than VEXC's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.94%2.30%2.58%2.97%2.96%3.00%1.63%3.13%2.08%1.81%1.98%0.25%
VEXC
Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.45%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GEM and VEXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GEM.

GEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.45% for VEXC.

GEM tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GEM and 0.07% for VEXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEM and VEXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer