GEM vs. EMXC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GEM (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - GEM tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index while EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GEM returned 7.71%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for EMXC. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

GEM vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEM achieves a 17.80% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 27.50% return.

GEM

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -2.35%
• 6M: 8.93%
• YTD: 17.80%
• 1Y: 35.17%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: 7.71%
• 10Y*: 8.48%
• ALL TIME*: 9.14%

EMXC

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -5.01%
• 6M: 16.09%
• YTD: 27.50%
• 1Y: 50.99%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	$245.04M	$277.03M	$277.07M
GEM Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$6.22M	$6.08M	$5.34M

GEM vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GEM Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	17.80%	33.43%	6.66%	11.82%	-21.33%	-0.19%	13.23%	17.79%	-14.25%	10.30%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	27.50%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GEM and EMXC is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017	0.88

The correlation between GEM and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

GEM vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GEM	EMXC
Technology	38.4%	53.4%
Financial Services	19.6%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	3.8%
Communication Services	6.1%	2.9%
Basic Materials	6.0%	5.5%
Industrials	5.5%	6.5%
Healthcare	3.0%	1.8%
Energy	2.9%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	2.4%
Utilities	1.8%	1.8%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.8%

Return for Risk

GEM vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GEM

GEM Risk / Return Rank: 64
GEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
GEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
GEM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GEM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 78
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GEM vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GEM	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.83	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	2.35	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	2.74	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	9.76	-2.19

GEM vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEM and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GEM vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEM drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEM and EMXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEM	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.02%	-42.81%	+5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.50%	-18.43%	+4.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-19.12%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.14%	-28.91%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.35%	-13.49%	+4.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-10.15%	-1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	5.17%	-0.66%

Volatility

GEM vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) is 8.66%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that GEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEM	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.66%	10.83%	-2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.69%	25.90%	-4.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.75%	27.60%	-3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.64%	19.04%	-0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.35%	20.50%	-1.15%

GEM vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

GEM vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

GEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than EMXC's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.09%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%
GEM Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.95%	2.30%	2.58%	2.97%	2.96%	3.00%	1.63%	3.13%	2.08%	1.81%	1.98%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GEM and EMXC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GEM and EMXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GEM or EMXC?

EMXC has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to GEM (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEM dropped -37.02% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, GEM or EMXC?

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 11.22% vs 7.71% for GEM. On fees, GEM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GEM or EMXC?

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 11.22% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GEM or EMXC?

GEM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GEM or EMXC?

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.95% for GEM.

What is the main difference between GEM and EMXC?

GEM tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GEM and 0.49% for EMXC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.