GELYY vs. QBTS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GELYY (Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd ADR) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. GELYY operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology).

Performance

GELYY vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd ADR (GELYY) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GELYY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QBTS

• 1D: -7.89%
• 1M: 31.69%
• YTD: 5.35%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 55.83%
• 3Y*: 162.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GELYY vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GELYY Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd ADR	0.00%
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	32.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GELYY : $25.12B QBTS : $10.12B
EPS GELYY : $57.67 QBTS : -$1.08
PS Ratio GELYY : 0.05 QBTS : 751.08
PB Ratio GELYY : 0.28 QBTS : 9.00
Total Revenue (TTM) GELYY : $496.50B QBTS : $12.44M
Gross Profit (TTM) GELYY : $79.79B QBTS : $8.25M
EBITDA (TTM) GELYY : $21.64B QBTS : -$399.03M

Return for Risk

GELYY vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 59
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GELYY vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd ADR (GELYY) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GELYY	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.20	—

Drawdowns

GELYY vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GELYY drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GELYY and QBTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GELYY	QBTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-96.67%	+96.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-71.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-79.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-38.48%	+38.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-65.87%	+65.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	40.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GELYY	QBTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	41.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	77.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	108.14%	-108.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	151.20%	-151.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	151.20%	-151.20%

Dividends

GELYY vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison

Neither GELYY nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials