GE vs. FER.AS
GE (General Electric Company) and FER.AS (Ferrovial SE) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — GE in Specialty Industrial Machinery, FER.AS in Infrastructure Operations. Over the past year, GE returned 26.65% vs 33.85% for FER.AS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GE vs. FER.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GE is traded in USD, while FER.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FER.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GE achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly higher than FER.AS's 2.77% return.
GE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 56.82%
- 5Y*
- 36.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
FER.AS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 33.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GE vs. FER.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GE General Electric Company | 4.70% | 85.73% | 64.83% | 20.33% |
FER.AS Ferrovial SE | 2.77% | 59.61% | 16.48% | 13.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between GE and FER.AS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2023 | 0.14 |
The correlation between GE and FER.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GE vs. FER.AS — Risk / Return Rank
GE
FER.AS
GE vs. FER.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Electric Company (GE) and Ferrovial SE (FER.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GE | FER.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.60 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | 4.64 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GE | FER.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.86 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.73 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
GE vs. FER.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GE drawdown since its inception was -85.53%, which is greater than FER.AS's maximum drawdown of -17.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GE and FER.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GE | FER.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.53% | -17.16% | -68.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -17.16% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -10.41% | +3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.79% | -4.96% | -20.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.78% | 5.95% | +1.83% |
Volatility
GE vs. FER.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Electric Company (GE) is 9.71%, while Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) has a volatility of 10.67%. This indicates that GE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FER.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GE | FER.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 10.67% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.76% | 21.73% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.41% | 32.27% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.02% | 40.40% | -9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.33% | 40.40% | -4.07% |
Dividends
GE vs. FER.AS - Dividend Comparison
GE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than FER.AS's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FER.AS Ferrovial SE | 1.95% | 1.58% | 1.99% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GE General Electric Company | 0.48% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 4.12% | 4.89% | 4.81% | 2.94% | 2.95% |
Financials
GE vs. FER.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Electric Company and Ferrovial SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GE and FER.AS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GE and FER.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer