GDXY vs. BABO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) and BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Over the past year, GDXY returned 20.95% vs -1.50% for BABO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

GDXY vs. BABO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -12.32% return, which is significantly higher than BABO's -20.64% return.

GDXY

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -14.26%
• YTD: -12.32%
• 6M: -11.68%
• 1Y: 20.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BABO

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -16.79%
• YTD: -20.64%
• 6M: -24.20%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXY vs. BABO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	-12.32%	88.08%	-5.86%
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	-20.64%	46.84%	0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXY and BABO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024	0.21

Return for Risk

GDXY vs. BABO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXY

GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 20
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BABO

BABO Risk / Return Rank: 8
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXY vs. BABO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXY	BABO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	-0.12	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	0.08	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.01	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	-0.13	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	-0.28	+2.11

GDXY vs. BABO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXY Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the BABO Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXY and BABO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDXY vs. BABO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, roughly equal to the maximum BABO drawdown of -33.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and BABO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXY	BABO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.16%	-33.33%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.16%	-33.33%	-0.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.61%	-33.33%	+3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	-13.90%	+7.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.05%	15.34%	-3.29%

Volatility

GDXY vs. BABO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) at 8.72%. This indicates that GDXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXY	BABO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.51%	8.72%	+5.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.60%	24.44%	+8.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.00%	35.33%	+2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.36%	36.67%	-4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.36%	36.67%	-4.31%

GDXY vs. BABO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDXY and BABO have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

GDXY vs. BABO - Dividend Comparison

GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.04%, less than BABO's 98.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	98.48%	85.50%	20.65%
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	82.04%	52.13%	23.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXY and BABO in my portfolio?

GDXY and BABO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXY or BABO?

GDXY has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to BABO (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXY dropped -34.16% vs BABO's -33.33%.

Which ETF is better, GDXY or BABO?

On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 20.95% vs -1.50% for BABO. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BABO has been the lower-risk option at 8.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDXY or BABO?

Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 20.95% return vs -1.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXY or BABO?

GDXY and BABO have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXY or BABO?

BABO has the higher dividend yield at 98.48%, compared with 82.04% for GDXY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.