PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXW vs. MSTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXW vs. MSTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly higher than MSTW's -23.56% return.


GDXW

1D
-4.02%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
2.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTW

1D
-8.54%
1M
-36.78%
YTD
-23.56%
6M
-41.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. MSTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF
-4.89%21.25%
MSTW
Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF
-23.56%-47.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and MSTW is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXW vs. MSTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDXW vs. MSTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXWMSTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.94

+1.39

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. MSTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum MSTW drawdown of -81.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and MSTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXWMSTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-81.85%

+45.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.99%

-78.15%

+45.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.45%

-54.49%

+41.04%

Volatility

GDXW vs. MSTW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXWMSTWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.39%

89.01%

-27.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.39%

89.01%

-27.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.39%

89.01%

-27.62%

GDXW vs. MSTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDXW and MSTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GDXW vs. MSTW - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, less than MSTW's 239.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF
39.39%7.48%
MSTW
Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF
239.64%106.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXW and MSTW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDXW and MSTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 239.64%, compared with 39.39% for GDXW.

GDXW is categorized as Gold, while MSTW is Derivative Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXW and MSTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer