GDXW vs. GLDI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and GLDI (UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033) are both Gold funds. GDXW is actively managed, while GLDI is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GLDI.

Performance

GDXW vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -10.11% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI's -2.88% return.

GDXW

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: -10.11%
• 6M: -15.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDI

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -5.67%
• YTD: -2.88%
• 6M: -3.64%
• 1Y: 14.20%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	-10.11%	25.26%
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033	-2.88%	8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and GLDI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

GDXW vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLDI

GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 25
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXW	GLDI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.01	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.38	—

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -43.76%, which is greater than GLDI's maximum drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and GLDI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXW	GLDI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.76%	-32.26%	-11.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.14%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.67%	-11.85%	-24.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.12%	-13.99%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDXW	GLDI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.83%	15.94%	+46.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.83%	11.55%	+51.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.83%	11.53%	+51.30%

GDXW vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXW vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.13%, more than GLDI's 26.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	46.13%	7.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033	26.24%	16.15%	10.45%	10.02%	13.73%	10.65%	14.25%	7.25%	5.33%	7.77%	17.26%	10.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXW and GLDI in my portfolio?

GDXW and GLDI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDXW or GLDI?

On fees, GLDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXW or GLDI?

GLDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXW or GLDI?

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 46.13%, compared with 26.24% for GLDI.

What is the main difference between GDXW and GLDI?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.65% for GLDI.