GDXW vs. FGDL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) are both Gold funds. GDXW is actively managed, while FGDL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FGDL.

Performance

GDXW vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -15.08% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's -4.86% return.

GDXW

• 1D: -5.53%
• 1M: -11.11%
• YTD: -15.08%
• 6M: -20.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FGDL

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -8.58%
• YTD: -4.86%
• 6M: -8.67%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	-15.08%	25.26%
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	-4.86%	10.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and FGDL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

GDXW vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGDL

FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 21
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXW	FGDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.77	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.12	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.31	—

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -43.76%, which is greater than FGDL's maximum drawdown of -24.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and FGDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXW	FGDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.76%	-24.73%	-19.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.73%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.18%	-23.98%	-16.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.28%	-4.07%	-11.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDXW	FGDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.03%	27.83%	+35.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.03%	19.33%	+43.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.03%	19.33%	+43.70%

GDXW vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXW vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.83%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	48.83%	7.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXW and FGDL in my portfolio?

GDXW and FGDL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDXW or FGDL?

On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXW or FGDL?

FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXW or FGDL?

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 48.83%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.

What is the main difference between GDXW and FGDL?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.15% for FGDL.