GDXW vs. CVSB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and CVSB (Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CVSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Calvert. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CVSB.

Performance

GDXW vs. CVSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than CVSB's 1.48% return.

GDXW

• 1D: -4.02%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: -4.89%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CVSB

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: 5.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. CVSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	-4.89%	21.25%
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF	1.48%	0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and CVSB is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

GDXW vs. CVSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVSB

CVSB Risk / Return Rank: 98
CVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. CVSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDXW	CVSB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	4.13	-3.68

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. CVSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than CVSB's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and CVSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXW	CVSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.83%	-0.63%	-36.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.23%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.99%	-0.03%	-32.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.45%	-0.05%	-13.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDXW	CVSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.39%	0.88%	+60.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.39%	1.32%	+60.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.39%	1.32%	+60.07%

GDXW vs. CVSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CVSB's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXW vs. CVSB - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, more than CVSB's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF	4.37%	4.72%	5.13%	4.95%
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	39.39%	7.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXW and CVSB in my portfolio?

GDXW and CVSB have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDXW or CVSB?

On fees, CVSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXW or CVSB?

CVSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXW or CVSB?

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 4.37% for CVSB.

What is the main difference between GDXW and CVSB?

GDXW is categorized as Gold, while CVSB is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.24% for CVSB.