PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXU vs. TYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXU vs. TYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -68.01% return, which is significantly lower than TYD's -8.67% return.


GDXU

1D
15.40%
1M
-31.80%
6M
-80.76%
YTD
-68.01%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
-11.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-18.29%

TYD

1D
-0.78%
1M
-3.38%
6M
-6.39%
YTD
-8.67%
1Y
-3.97%
3Y*
-4.77%
5Y*
-14.54%
10Y*
-5.55%
ALL TIME*
0.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. TYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-68.01%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.32%
TYD
Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X
-8.67%11.68%-13.89%-2.87%-43.32%-11.36%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and TYD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXU vs. TYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

TYD
TYD Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYD Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. TYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXUTYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.96

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

-0.29

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.09

-0.64

+0.73

GDXU vs. TYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the TYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and TYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. TYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than TYD's maximum drawdown of -64.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and TYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUTYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-64.28%

-30.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.14%

-13.54%

-73.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.14%

-22.32%

-64.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.30%

-59.84%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.15%

-60.31%

-24.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.00%

-22.22%

-47.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.28%

6.24%

+40.04%

Volatility

GDXU vs. TYD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 38.61% compared to Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD) at 3.93%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUTYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.61%

3.93%

+34.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

127.15%

10.30%

+116.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.85%

13.80%

+133.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.16%

22.92%

+90.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

111.49%

20.20%

+91.29%

GDXU vs. TYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TYD's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXU vs. TYD - Dividend Comparison

GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TYD
Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X
3.38%2.97%3.10%2.71%0.55%0.00%9.80%0.92%1.10%0.01%6.84%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXU and TYD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (38.61%) compared to TYD (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs TYD's -64.28%.

On 5-year performance, GDXU leads with -11.66% vs -14.54% for TYD. On fees, GDXU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TYD has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GDXU has performed better with a -11.66% return vs -14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for TYD.

TYD has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

GDXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TYD is Leveraged Bonds. GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while TYD tracks NYSE 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXU and 1.09% for TYD.

GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXU and TYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer