GDXU vs. SOXL
GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - GDXU tracks the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDXU returned -10.23%/yr vs 46.78%/yr for SOXL. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
GDXU vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -41.62% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 525.03% return.
GDXU
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- -41.62%
- 6M
- -31.92%
- 1Y
- 76.85%
- 3Y*
- 47.72%
- 5Y*
- -10.23%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- -6.36%
- 1M
- 82.23%
- YTD
- 525.03%
- 6M
- 481.71%
- 1Y
- 1,280.87%
- 3Y*
- 133.82%
- 5Y*
- 46.78%
- 10Y*
- 64.43%
GDXU vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | -41.62% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -54.93% | 4.66% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 525.03% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 8.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXU and SOXL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.25 |
GDXU vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDXU
SOXL
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDXU
SOXL
-
Communication Services
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Energy
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Financial Services
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Technology
GDXU
-
SOXL
Utilities
GDXU
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXU vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
GDXU
SOXL
GDXU vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXU | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.69 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 29.80 | -28.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 102.14 | -100.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXU | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 12.69 | -12.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.44 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.51 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
GDXU vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXU | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -90.46% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.99% | -43.47% | -30.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.99% | -87.88% | +13.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.93% | -90.46% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.90% | -6.36% | -66.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.77% | -35.01% | -34.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.52% | 12.66% | +23.86% |
Volatility
GDXU vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 46.65% compared to Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) at 41.05%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXU | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.65% | 41.05% | +5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 118.08% | 81.57% | +36.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.54% | 102.16% | +35.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.85% | 107.25% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.00% | 99.05% | +10.95% |
GDXU vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXU vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXU and SOXL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (46.65%) compared to SOXL (41.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 5-year performance, SOXL leads with 46.78% vs -10.23% for GDXU. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SOXL has been the lower-risk option at 41.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 46.78% return vs -10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXU.
SOXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.
GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXU and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.69 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXU and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer