PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXU vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXU vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -69.22% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


GDXU

1D
-10.43%
1M
-21.69%
6M
-73.59%
YTD
-69.22%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
-14.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-18.76%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$99.61M$115.40M$172.82M
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M

GDXU vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-69.22%796.47%-15.09%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and SBIT is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.21

The correlation between GDXU and SBIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXU vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDXU vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXUSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

2.35

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

5.19

-4.92

GDXU vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, roughly equal to the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-91.35%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.14%

-47.94%

-39.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.71%

-77.87%

-7.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.08%

-69.07%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.64%

21.67%

+26.97%

Volatility

GDXU vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 38.79% compared to Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) at 18.09%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.79%

18.09%

+20.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

125.93%

67.10%

+58.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

147.32%

88.65%

+58.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.44%

96.10%

+17.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

111.56%

96.10%

+15.46%

GDXU vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDXU and SBIT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

GDXU vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GDXU and SBIT have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (38.79%) compared to SBIT (18.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 8.47% for GDXU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SBIT has been the lower-risk option at 18.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXU and SBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

GDXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and ProShares.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXU and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer