GDXU vs. NTSD
GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. GDXU is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GDXU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
GDXU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDXU
- 1D
- 7.92%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -72.51%
- YTD
- -64.09%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 37.83%
- 5Y*
- -10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -16.49%
NTSD
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $105.89M | $107.55M | $168.52M | |
| $202.33K | $175.82K | $314.52K |
GDXU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -54.55% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 23.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXU and NTSD is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXU vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
GDXU
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDXU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -5.58% | -88.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.33% | 0.00% | -83.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.10% | -1.21% | -68.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.21% | — | — |
Volatility
GDXU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 117.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.65% | 23.29% | +124.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.58% | 23.29% | +90.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.57% | 23.29% | +88.28% |
GDXU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | 0.00% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXU.
NTSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for GDXU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer