PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXU vs. HIMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXU vs. HIMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -56.00% return, which is significantly lower than HIMS's -17.40% return.


GDXU

1D
8.84%
1M
-50.11%
YTD
-56.00%
6M
-55.92%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
37.87%
5Y*
-14.73%
10Y*

HIMS

1D
-7.10%
1M
11.10%
YTD
-17.40%
6M
-27.92%
1Y
-53.07%
3Y*
43.69%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. HIMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-56.00%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.32%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
-17.40%34.28%171.69%38.85%-2.14%-55.14%38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and HIMS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXU vs. HIMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMS
HIMS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
HIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. HIMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXUHIMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.95

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

-0.68

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

-1.10

+1.91

GDXU vs. HIMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the HIMS Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and HIMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. HIMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than HIMS's maximum drawdown of -87.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and HIMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUHIMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-87.29%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.97%

-78.06%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.97%

-78.88%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.44%

-78.88%

-13.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.58%

-60.98%

-18.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.77%

-43.23%

-26.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.59%

48.06%

-9.47%

Volatility

GDXU vs. HIMS - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 54.28% compared to Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) at 21.36%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUHIMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.28%

21.36%

+32.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

123.72%

67.20%

+56.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

142.00%

96.46%

+45.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

111.92%

83.26%

+28.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.82%

77.20%

+33.62%

Dividends

GDXU vs. HIMS - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDXU nor HIMS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXU and HIMS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to HIMS (21.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs HIMS's -87.29%.

GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXU and HIMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer