GDXU vs. DE
GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while DE (Deere & Company) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GDXU returned -14.73%/yr vs 12.54%/yr for DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDXU vs. DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -56.00% return, which is significantly lower than DE's 24.40% return.
GDXU
- 1D
- 8.84%
- 1M
- -50.11%
- YTD
- -56.00%
- 6M
- -55.92%
- 1Y
- 30.95%
- 3Y*
- 37.87%
- 5Y*
- -14.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DE
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 24.40%
- 6M
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 13.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- 23.07%
GDXU vs. DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -56.00% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -54.93% | 4.32% |
DE Deere & Company | 24.40% | 11.39% | 7.56% | -5.48% | 26.59% | 28.86% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXU and DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXU vs. DE — Risk / Return Rank
GDXU
DE
GDXU vs. DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Deere & Company (DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXU | DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.11 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.67 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 1.38 | -0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXU vs. DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than DE's maximum drawdown of -73.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXU | DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -73.27% | -21.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.97% | -19.90% | -64.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.97% | -21.59% | -62.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.44% | -33.81% | -58.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.58% | -12.58% | -67.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.77% | -18.61% | -51.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.59% | 9.58% | +29.01% |
Volatility
GDXU vs. DE - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 54.28% compared to Deere & Company (DE) at 10.51%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXU | DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 54.28% | 10.51% | +43.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 123.72% | 24.42% | +99.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 142.00% | 30.03% | +111.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.92% | 29.39% | +82.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.82% | 30.40% | +80.42% |
Dividends
GDXU vs. DE - Dividend Comparison
GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DE Deere & Company | 1.12% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.75% | 1.84% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 3.15% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXU and DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to DE (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs DE's -73.27%.
DE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXU and DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer