PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXU vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXU vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -43.81% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


GDXU

1D
-10.63%
1M
-11.26%
YTD
-43.81%
6M
-33.96%
1Y
72.31%
3Y*
46.61%
5Y*
-10.91%
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN
-43.81%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.66%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and DBO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.14

The correlation between GDXU and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDXU vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDXU
DBO

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

116.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GDXU
100.0%
DBO

-

Communication Services

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Energy

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Financial Services

GDXU

-

DBO
116.0%

Healthcare

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Industrials

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Real Estate

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Technology

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Utilities

GDXU

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXU vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXUDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

4.44

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

9.02

-7.02

GDXU vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXUDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

2.34

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.50

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.02

-0.11

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, roughly equal to the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-90.18%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.99%

-18.19%

-55.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.99%

-28.20%

-45.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.93%

-37.68%

-55.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.92%

-51.38%

-22.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.77%

-62.25%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.23%

8.92%

+27.31%

Volatility

GDXU vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 46.45% compared to Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) at 12.61%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.45%

12.61%

+33.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

118.07%

28.20%

+89.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.57%

34.46%

+103.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.85%

32.29%

+78.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.02%

31.78%

+78.24%

GDXU vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXU vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXU and DBO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (46.45%) compared to DBO (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs -10.91% for GDXU. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBO has been the lower-risk option at 12.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs -10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXU.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

GDXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXU and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXU and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer