GDXU vs. BRKL
GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. GDXU is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.18 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GDXU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
GDXU vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDXU
- 1D
- 7.92%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -72.51%
- YTD
- -64.09%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 37.83%
- 5Y*
- -10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -16.49%
BRKL
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.23K | $15.92K | $15.92K | |
| $105.89M | $107.55M | $168.52M |
GDXU vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -10.01% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 3.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXU and BRKL is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXU vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
GDXU
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDXU vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXU | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXU vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXU | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -7.03% | -87.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.33% | 0.00% | -83.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.10% | -3.74% | -66.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.21% | — | — |
Volatility
GDXU vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXU | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 117.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.65% | 29.89% | +117.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.58% | 29.89% | +83.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.57% | 29.89% | +81.68% |
GDXU vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXU vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDXU nor BRKL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXU and BRKL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXU.
GDXU and BRKL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXU and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for GDXU and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer