GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO
GDXU.TO (BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF) and ENBE.TO (Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Gold Miners Index, while ENBE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. GDXU.TO is passively managed, while ENBE.TO is actively managed. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GDXU.TO charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ENBE.TO.
Performance
GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXU.TO achieves a -36.40% return, which is significantly lower than ENBE.TO's 20.40% return.
GDXU.TO
- 1D
- -6.66%
- 1M
- -21.37%
- 6M
- -43.38%
- YTD
- -36.40%
- 1Y
- 75.88%
- 3Y*
- 74.66%
- 5Y*
- 29.52%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.71%
ENBE.TO
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 19.49%
- YTD
- 20.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$135.31K | CA$104.69K | CA$69.67K | |
| CA$8.76M | CA$7.65M | CA$7.55M |
GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXU.TO BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF | -36.40% | 117.82% |
ENBE.TO Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 20.40% | -0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXU.TO and ENBE.TO is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GDXU.TO
ENBE.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF (GDXU.TO) and Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (ENBE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXU.TO | ENBE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.01%, which is greater than ENBE.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU.TO and ENBE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXU.TO | ENBE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.01% | -11.28% | -86.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.75% | -5.26% | -57.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.25% | -3.14% | -75.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.71% | — | — |
Volatility
GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXU.TO | ENBE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.86% | 18.34% | +75.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.96% | 18.34% | +50.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.33% | 18.34% | +48.99% |
GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXU.TO has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ENBE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Dividend Comparison
GDXU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENBE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ENBE.TO Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 10.95% | 4.47% |
GDXU.TO BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXU.TO and ENBE.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENBE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENBE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for GDXU.TO.
GDXU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ENBE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for GDXU.TO and 0.40% for ENBE.TO.
Find the right allocation for GDXU.TO and ENBE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer