GDXU.TO vs. CASH.TO
GDXU.TO (BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDXU.TO returned 82.36%/yr vs 3.53%/yr for CASH.TO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GDXU.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXU.TO achieves a -28.76% return, which is significantly lower than CASH.TO's 1.00% return.
GDXU.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -28.04%
- YTD
- -28.76%
- 6M
- -30.23%
- 1Y
- 101.37%
- 3Y*
- 82.36%
- 5Y*
- 35.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 2.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXU.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU.TO BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF | -28.76% | 432.04% | 49.04% | 1.08% | -13.97% | 7.40% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 1.00% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.38% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXU.TO and CASH.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXU.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GDXU.TO
CASH.TO
GDXU.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF (GDXU.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXU.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -22.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 6.54 | -5.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 109.63 | -107.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 368.50 | -364.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXU.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.01%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXU.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.01% | -0.80% | -97.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.60% | -0.02% | -60.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.60% | -0.06% | -60.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.27% | -0.00% | -58.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.33% | -0.00% | -78.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.19% | 0.01% | +26.18% |
Volatility
GDXU.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF (GDXU.TO) has a higher volatility of 32.90% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that GDXU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXU.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.90% | 0.06% | +32.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.15% | 0.15% | +76.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.66% | 0.24% | +91.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.25% | 0.61% | +67.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.32% | 0.61% | +66.71% |
Dividends
GDXU.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
GDXU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.12% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
GDXU.TO BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXU.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CASH.TO is Money Market.
Find the right allocation for GDXU.TO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer