GDX vs. VNO
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while VNO (Vornado Realty Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 12.82%/yr vs -3.63%/yr for VNO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDX vs. VNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than VNO's 8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed VNO with an annualized return of 12.82%, while VNO has yielded a comparatively lower -3.63% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
VNO
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- -8.07%
- 3Y*
- 35.06%
- 5Y*
- -3.27%
- 10Y*
- -3.63%
GDX vs. VNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
VNO Vornado Realty Trust | 8.77% | -19.09% | 51.32% | 39.50% | -46.66% | 17.78% | -40.43% | 14.93% | -17.75% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and VNO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2006 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. VNO — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
VNO
GDX vs. VNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | VNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.99 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | -0.20 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | -0.38 | +4.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | VNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | -0.25 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.08 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | -0.09 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.29 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. VNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, roughly equal to the maximum VNO drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and VNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | VNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -80.89% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -41.22% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.09% | -43.88% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -72.46% | +25.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -80.89% | +31.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.09% | -41.31% | +9.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -20.59% | -19.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 21.24% | -8.82% |
Volatility
GDX vs. VNO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) at 10.04%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | VNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 10.04% | +6.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 23.04% | +15.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 32.81% | +13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 41.61% | -5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 39.11% | -1.84% |
Dividends
GDX vs. VNO - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than VNO's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
VNO Vornado Realty Trust | 2.04% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 2.39% | 10.19% | 5.06% | 6.37% | 6.90% | 4.06% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 14.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and VNO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to VNO (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs VNO's -80.89%.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and VNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer