GDX vs. IXC
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 12.82%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for IXC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXC.
Performance
GDX vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 30.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 12.82%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
IXC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 30.67%
- 6M
- 30.15%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
GDX vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 30.67% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and IXC is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2006 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GDX and IXC has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GDX vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
IXC
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDX
IXC
-
Communication Services
GDX
-
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
IXC
-
Energy
GDX
-
IXC
Financial Services
GDX
-
IXC
-
Healthcare
GDX
-
IXC
-
Industrials
GDX
-
IXC
-
Real Estate
GDX
-
IXC
-
Technology
GDX
-
IXC
-
Utilities
GDX
-
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
IXC
GDX vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 4.82 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 14.26 | -9.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.48 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.83 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.38 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.32 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -67.88% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -9.66% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.09% | -19.06% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -24.93% | -21.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -64.16% | +14.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.09% | -5.96% | -26.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -17.47% | -22.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 3.26% | +9.16% |
Volatility
GDX vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.55%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 6.55% | +9.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 15.51% | +23.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 18.79% | +27.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 23.52% | +13.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 26.85% | +10.42% |
GDX vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IXC's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.82% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and IXC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to IXC (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 12.82% vs 10.03% for IXC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while IXC is Energy Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.46% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer