PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX vs. ARTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX vs. ARTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than ARTY's 60.68% return.


GDX

1D
6.55%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
1.22%
1Y
57.71%
3Y*
41.18%
5Y*
19.97%
10Y*
13.81%

ARTY

1D
5.66%
1M
17.65%
YTD
60.68%
6M
63.32%
1Y
104.26%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. ARTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.58%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-2.79%
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
60.68%29.97%8.02%36.37%-37.89%6.32%48.85%34.47%-13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and ARTY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.23

The correlation between GDX and ARTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX vs. ARTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ARTY
ARTY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ARTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ARTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARTY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. ARTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXARTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.47

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

5.57

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

18.40

-14.01

GDX vs. ARTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the ARTY Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and ARTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDX vs. ARTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than ARTY's maximum drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and ARTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXARTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-54.50%

-25.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-18.81%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-32.44%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-50.53%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.39%

-4.13%

-22.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.41%

-19.80%

-20.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.22%

5.69%

+7.53%

Volatility

GDX vs. ARTY - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) have volatilities of 18.56% and 18.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXARTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.56%

18.52%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.52%

29.30%

+10.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.30%

33.37%

+13.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.86%

29.33%

+7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.37%

28.18%

+9.19%

GDX vs. ARTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than ARTY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDX vs. ARTY - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than ARTY's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
0.06%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDX and ARTY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (18.56%) compared to ARTY (18.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs ARTY's -54.50%.

On 5-year performance, GDX leads with 19.97% vs 13.27% for ARTY. On fees, ARTY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GDX has performed better with a 19.97% return vs 13.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARTY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.06% for ARTY.

GDX is categorized as Gold, while ARTY is Technology Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while ARTY tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.47% for ARTY.

ARTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX and ARTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer