GDX vs. AIQ
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDX returned 17.28%/yr vs 17.37%/yr for AIQ. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
GDX vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 26.70% return.
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
AIQ
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 26.70%
- 6M
- 25.19%
- 1Y
- 55.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.87%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- —
GDX vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -4.75% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 26.70% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and AIQ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.23 |
The correlation between GDX and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDX vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
AIQ
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDX
AIQ
-
Communication Services
GDX
-
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
AIQ
-
Energy
GDX
-
AIQ
-
Financial Services
GDX
-
AIQ
Healthcare
GDX
-
AIQ
Industrials
GDX
-
AIQ
Real Estate
GDX
-
AIQ
-
Technology
GDX
-
AIQ
Utilities
GDX
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
AIQ
GDX vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 3.36 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 11.43 | -7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.24 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.68 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.79 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -44.66% | -35.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -16.47% | -15.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.09% | -26.35% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -44.66% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.09% | -8.13% | -23.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -9.79% | -30.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 4.84% | +7.58% |
Volatility
GDX vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) at 12.72%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 12.72% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 20.70% | +17.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 24.76% | +21.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 25.63% | +10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 25.67% | +11.60% |
GDX vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than AIQ's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and AIQ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to AIQ (12.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 17.37% vs 17.28% for GDX. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 12.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 17.37% return vs 17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while AIQ is Technology Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer