PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDOG vs. SOEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDOG vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDOG achieves a -23.98% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -43.12% return.


GDOG

1D
-2.70%
1M
-21.69%
YTD
-23.98%
6M
-39.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOEZ

1D
-3.99%
1M
-20.02%
YTD
-43.12%
6M
-49.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDOG vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GDOG
Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF
-23.98%-22.32%
SOEZ
Franklin Solana ETF
-43.12%-11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GDOG and SOEZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDOG vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDOG vs. SOEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDOGSOEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.88

-1.10

+0.21

Drawdowns

GDOG vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDOG drawdown since its inception was -42.91%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOG and SOEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDOGSOEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.91%

-52.20%

+9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.75%

-52.20%

+9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.59%

-30.97%

+2.38%

Volatility

GDOG vs. SOEZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDOGSOEZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.77%

68.82%

+4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.77%

68.82%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.77%

68.82%

+4.95%

GDOG vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDOG vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

GDOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GDOG and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GDOG.

SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for GDOG.

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GDOG and 0.19% for SOEZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDOG and SOEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer