PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDO vs. VLTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDO vs. VLTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund Inc (GDO) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDO achieves a -3.49% return, which is significantly lower than VLTCX's 1.22% return. Over the past 10 years, GDO has outperformed VLTCX with an annualized return of 4.29%, while VLTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.


GDO

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
-3.49%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
4.29%

VLTCX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.99%
YTD
1.22%
6M
0.35%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDO vs. VLTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund Inc
-3.49%18.25%-0.79%10.39%-20.30%3.38%6.82%30.72%-10.12%13.48%
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.22%7.27%-1.47%11.05%-25.77%-1.16%13.68%23.19%-6.85%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GDO and VLTCX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2009

0.15

The correlation between GDO and VLTCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDO vs. VLTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDO
GDO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VLTCX
VLTCX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VLTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VLTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDO vs. VLTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund Inc (GDO) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDOVLTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.60

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

3.93

-1.33

GDO vs. VLTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the VLTCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDO and VLTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDOVLTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.11

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

-0.12

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.23

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.45

-0.05

Drawdowns

GDO vs. VLTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDO drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, roughly equal to the maximum VLTCX drawdown of -34.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDO and VLTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDOVLTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-34.56%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-5.29%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-12.87%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.61%

-34.56%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.61%

-34.56%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-13.80%

+9.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-8.04%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.15%

+0.58%

Volatility

GDO vs. VLTCX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund Inc (GDO) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX) have volatilities of 2.54% and 2.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDOVLTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.46%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

5.52%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.19%

7.68%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

11.87%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.29%

10.60%

+2.69%

GDO vs. VLTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDO has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VLTCX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GDO vs. VLTCX - Dividend Comparison

GDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.57%, more than VLTCX's 5.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund Inc
13.57%12.40%12.04%9.52%9.49%6.93%6.70%6.65%8.41%7.57%7.96%8.62%
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.50%5.48%5.58%4.65%4.41%3.03%3.15%3.82%4.56%4.01%4.37%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDO and VLTCX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDO has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to VLTCX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDO dropped -34.61% vs VLTCX's -34.56%.

VLTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDO and VLTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer