GDMN vs. DHS
GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. GDMN is actively managed, while DHS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDMN returned 54.79%/yr vs 17.11%/yr for DHS. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GDMN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
GDMN vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDMN achieves a -21.29% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 17.07% return.
GDMN
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- 6M
- -30.05%
- YTD
- -21.29%
- 1Y
- 49.41%
- 3Y*
- 54.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.15%
DHS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.47M | $3.71M | $2.99M | |
| $1.47M | $2.23M | $3.42M |
GDMN vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -21.29% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 6.93% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 17.07% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDMN and DHS is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between GDMN and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDMN vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDMN
DHS
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GDMN
DHS
Communication Services
GDMN
-
DHS
Consumer Cyclical
GDMN
-
DHS
Consumer Defensive
GDMN
-
DHS
Energy
GDMN
-
DHS
Financial Services
GDMN
-
DHS
Healthcare
GDMN
-
DHS
Industrials
GDMN
-
DHS
Real Estate
GDMN
-
DHS
Technology
GDMN
-
DHS
Utilities
GDMN
-
DHS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDMN vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
GDMN
DHS
GDMN vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDMN | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 4.09 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 15.00 | -13.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDMN vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDMN drawdown since its inception was -52.82%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMN and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDMN | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.82% | -67.25% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.02% | -6.30% | -45.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.02% | -11.87% | -40.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.33% | -1.89% | -46.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -9.48% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.95% | 1.71% | +23.24% |
Volatility
GDMN vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a higher volatility of 14.93% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 3.77%. This indicates that GDMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDMN | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.93% | 3.77% | +11.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.31% | 7.84% | +41.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.05% | 10.40% | +54.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.34% | 13.91% | +34.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.34% | 16.10% | +32.24% |
GDMN vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDMN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDMN vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than DHS's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.18% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.43% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDMN and DHS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (14.93%) compared to DHS (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMN dropped -52.82% vs DHS's -67.25%.
On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 54.79% vs 17.11% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 54.79% return vs 17.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.
GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 3.18% for DHS.
GDMN is categorized as Commodities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GDMN and 0.38% for DHS.
DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDMN and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer