PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDMN vs. COM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GDMN vs. COM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GDMN vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
8.77%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
14.18%7.72%5.81%-2.09%9.17%1.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMN achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than COM's 14.18% return.


GDMN

1D
9.38%
1M
-27.72%
YTD
8.77%
6M
31.63%
1Y
140.14%
3Y*
65.41%
5Y*
10Y*

COM

1D
0.21%
1M
5.67%
YTD
14.18%
6M
18.01%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GDMN vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDMN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GDMN vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDMN vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDMNCOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

1.72

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

2.24

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

2.96

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.63

6.37

+6.26

GDMN vs. COM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMN Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the COM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMN and COM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDMNCOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.72

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.73

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between GDMN and COM is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GDMN vs. COM - Dividend Comparison

GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, which matches COM's 2.48% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.48%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.48%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%

Drawdowns

GDMN vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMN drawdown since its inception was -52.82%, which is greater than COM's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMN and COM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GDMNCOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.82%

-15.95%

-36.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.03%

-6.15%

-32.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.60%

-0.64%

-27.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.45%

-6.38%

-12.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.39%

2.86%

+8.53%

Volatility

GDMN vs. COM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a higher volatility of 24.97% compared to Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) at 3.77%. This indicates that GDMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GDMNCOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.97%

3.77%

+21.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.89%

8.21%

+45.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.99%

10.35%

+53.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.19%

9.71%

+37.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.19%

9.76%

+37.43%