GDLC vs. GSOL
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. GDLC is passively managed, while GSOL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSOL.
Performance
GDLC vs. GSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -17.46%
- YTD
- -32.51%
- 6M
- -32.63%
- 1Y
- -38.54%
- 3Y*
- 49.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- —
GSOL
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC vs. GSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -16.75% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -14.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and GSOL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. GSOL — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
GSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDLC vs. GSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDLC | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. GSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than GSOL's maximum drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and GSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -22.60% | -71.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.58% | -15.93% | -40.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.78% | -12.89% | -39.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.36% | — | — |
Volatility
GDLC vs. GSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.09% | 83.47% | -34.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.78% | 83.47% | -9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.18% | 83.47% | +10.71% |
GDLC vs. GSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GSOL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. GSOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDLC nor GSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GDLC and GSOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
GDLC and GSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.35% for GSOL.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and GSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer