GDLC vs. BFOC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - GDLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk 5 Index, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. GDLC is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.

Performance

GDLC vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -30.16% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -6.79% return.

GDLC

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.19%
• 6M: -19.67%
• YTD: -30.16%
• 1Y: -42.29%
• 3Y*: 49.03%
• 5Y*: -3.08%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.89%

BFOC

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: -4.12%
• YTD: -6.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	$40.00K	$49.38K	$63.64K
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	$1.36M	$1.40M	$1.44M

GDLC vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	-30.16%	-26.08%
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-6.79%	-9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and BFOC is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

GDLC vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDLC

GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 3
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BFOC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDLC vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDLC	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	—	—

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and BFOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDLC	BFOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.14%	-18.41%	-75.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.07%	-17.67%	-37.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.83%	-13.52%	-39.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDLC	BFOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.03%	11.69%	+37.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.69%	11.69%	+60.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.49%	11.69%	+81.80%

GDLC vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDLC vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDLC nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDLC and BFOC in my portfolio?

GDLC and BFOC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDLC or BFOC?

On fees, GDLC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDLC or BFOC?

GDLC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDLC or BFOC?

GDLC and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GDLC and BFOC?

GDLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.90% for BFOC.