PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDLC vs. BCDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GDLC vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GDLC vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GDLC
Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF
-24.52%0.45%136.98%353.26%-60.10%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
1.72%11.63%14.87%24.99%-22.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 1.72% return.


GDLC

1D
2.20%
1M
3.93%
YTD
-24.52%
6M
-44.20%
1Y
-10.19%
3Y*
65.34%
5Y*
-3.20%
10Y*

BCDF

1D
2.24%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
1.72%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GDLC vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GDLC vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDLC
GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDLC vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDLCBCDFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.20

0.78

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

1.19

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.15

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

1.40

-1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.41

3.61

-4.02

GDLC vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDLC Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDLC and BCDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDLCBCDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

0.78

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.38

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and BCDF is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GDLC vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.


TTM2025202420232022
GDLC
Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.48%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and BCDF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GDLCBCDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.14%

-27.70%

-66.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

-8.84%

-44.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.45%

-5.09%

-46.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.90%

-10.23%

-42.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.86%

3.44%

+21.42%

Volatility

GDLC vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) has a higher volatility of 13.67% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.22%. This indicates that GDLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GDLCBCDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.67%

5.22%

+8.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.43%

11.75%

+28.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.42%

16.82%

+33.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.87%

17.06%

+60.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.02%

17.06%

+77.96%