GDLC vs. BCDF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. GDLC is passively managed, while BCDF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDLC returned 49.03%/yr vs 15.30%/yr for BCDF. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.

Performance

GDLC vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -30.16% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 6.93% return.

GDLC

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.19%
• 6M: -19.67%
• YTD: -30.16%
• 1Y: -42.29%
• 3Y*: 49.03%
• 5Y*: -3.08%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.89%

BCDF

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 6.12%
• 6M: 3.41%
• YTD: 6.93%
• 1Y: 6.47%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	$17.03K	$19.91K	$42.03K
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	$1.36M	$1.40M	$1.44M

GDLC vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	-30.16%	0.45%	136.98%	353.26%	-59.89%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	6.93%	11.63%	14.87%	24.99%	-21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and BCDF is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022	0.44

Return for Risk

GDLC vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDLC

GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 3
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 20
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDLC vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDLC	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	0.43	-1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	0.68	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.08	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	0.46	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	1.46	-2.57

GDLC vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDLC Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDLC and BCDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDLC	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.14%	-27.70%	-66.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.18%	-14.02%	-43.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.18%	-14.02%	-43.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.07%	-4.32%	-50.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.83%	-9.75%	-43.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.88%	4.46%	+33.42%

Volatility

GDLC vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 2.45%. This indicates that GDLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDLC	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	2.45%	+6.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.61%	11.22%	+24.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.03%	15.10%	+33.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.69%	16.86%	+54.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.49%	16.86%	+76.63%

GDLC vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDLC vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.36%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDLC and BCDF in my portfolio?

GDLC and BCDF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDLC or BCDF?

GDLC has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to BCDF (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDLC dropped -94.14% vs BCDF's -27.70%.

Which ETF is better, GDLC or BCDF?

On 3-year performance, GDLC leads with 49.03% vs 15.30% for BCDF. On fees, GDLC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BCDF has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDLC or BCDF?

Over the 3-year period, GDLC has performed better with a 49.03% return vs 15.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDLC or BCDF?

GDLC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDLC or BCDF?

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.00% for GDLC.

What is the main difference between GDLC and BCDF?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.85% for BCDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.