PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDIV vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDIV vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIV achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.


GDIV

1D
0.07%
1M
1.78%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.35%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDIV vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
11.99%10.81%14.83%7.23%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.99%5.66%4.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GDIV and IBID is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.01

The correlation between GDIV and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDIV vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIV
GDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIV vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDIVIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.75

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

8.22

-5.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

30.99

-19.39

GDIV vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDIV and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDIV vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIV drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIV and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDIVIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.93%

-1.28%

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-0.49%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.49%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-0.22%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

0.13%

+2.19%

Volatility

GDIV vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that GDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDIVIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

0.35%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

0.86%

+8.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

1.23%

+10.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

2.24%

+13.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

2.24%

+13.04%

GDIV vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDIV vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

GDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
1.12%1.19%1.30%2.27%5.88%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDIV and IBID have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDIV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDIV dropped -18.93% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, GDIV leads with 26.87% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDIV has performed better with a 26.87% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GDIV.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.12% for GDIV.

GDIV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GDIV and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDIV and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer