GDEC vs. OILK
GDEC (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDEC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. GDEC is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past year, GDEC returned 15.63% vs 58.99% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. GDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
GDEC vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDEC achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
GDEC
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
GDEC vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GDEC FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December | 5.14% | 12.14% | 11.45% | 0.46% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -2.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDEC and OILK is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2023 | -0.05 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GDEC and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
GDEC vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDEC
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
GDEC
OILK
-
Financial Services
GDEC
OILK
-
Communication Services
GDEC
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDEC
OILK
Healthcare
GDEC
OILK
-
Industrials
GDEC
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
GDEC
OILK
-
Energy
GDEC
OILK
-
Utilities
GDEC
OILK
-
Real Estate
GDEC
OILK
-
Basic Materials
GDEC
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDEC vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
GDEC
OILK
GDEC vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDEC | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.34 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.42 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.29 | 6.91 | +10.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDEC | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.06 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.12 | +1.40 |
Drawdowns
GDEC vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.61%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDEC and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDEC | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -83.76% | +73.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.79% | -17.35% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -3.66% | +3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -32.61% | +31.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 8.56% | -7.65% |
Volatility
GDEC vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) is 0.87%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that GDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDEC | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 10.44% | -9.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.63% | 23.26% | -18.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.88% | 28.75% | -22.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 30.12% | -22.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 35.97% | -28.01% |
GDEC vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDEC vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
GDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDEC FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDEC and OILK have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to GDEC (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDEC dropped -10.61% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 15.63% for GDEC. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GDEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GDEC.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for GDEC.
GDEC is categorized as Options Trading, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GDEC and 0.68% for OILK.
GDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDEC and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer