PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDEC vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDEC vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDEC achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


GDEC

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.94%
YTD
5.14%
6M
6.04%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDEC vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GDEC
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December
5.14%12.14%11.45%0.46%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GDEC and OILK is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2023

-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GDEC and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

GDEC vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDEC
OILK

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

GDEC
36.2%
OILK

-

Financial Services

GDEC
11.9%
OILK

-

Communication Services

GDEC
10.9%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

GDEC
10.1%
OILK
100.0%

Healthcare

GDEC
8.4%
OILK

-

Industrials

GDEC
8.1%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

GDEC
4.9%
OILK

-

Energy

GDEC
3.5%
OILK

-

Utilities

GDEC
2.3%
OILK

-

Real Estate

GDEC
1.9%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

GDEC
1.8%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDEC vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDEC
GDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDEC vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDECOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.34

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.42

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.29

6.91

+10.38

GDEC vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDEC and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDECOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.06

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.12

+1.40

Drawdowns

GDEC vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.61%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDEC and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDECOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-83.76%

+73.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-17.35%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-3.66%

+3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-32.61%

+31.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

8.56%

-7.65%

Volatility

GDEC vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) is 0.87%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that GDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDECOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

10.44%

-9.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

23.26%

-18.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.88%

28.75%

-22.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.96%

30.12%

-22.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

35.97%

-28.01%

GDEC vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDEC vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

GDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDEC
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDEC and OILK have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to GDEC (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDEC dropped -10.61% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 15.63% for GDEC. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GDEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GDEC.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for GDEC.

GDEC is categorized as Options Trading, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GDEC and 0.68% for OILK.

GDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDEC and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer