PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDEC vs. AJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDEC vs. AJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDEC achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than AJAN's 2.05% return.


GDEC

1D
0.05%
1M
1.94%
YTD
5.31%
6M
6.49%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AJAN

1D
0.04%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.46%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDEC vs. AJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDEC and AJAN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024

0.72

The correlation between GDEC and AJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDEC vs. AJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDEC
GDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AJAN
AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDEC vs. AJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDECAJANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

2.66

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

4.16

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.60

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.82

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.29

14.21

+4.08

GDEC vs. AJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the AJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDEC and AJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDECAJANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.66

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

1.75

-0.22

Drawdowns

GDEC vs. AJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.61%, which is greater than AJAN's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDEC and AJAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDECAJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-4.11%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-2.24%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.07%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-0.29%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.44%

+0.47%

Volatility

GDEC vs. AJAN - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) at 0.71%. This indicates that GDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDECAJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

0.71%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

2.04%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.88%

2.35%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.96%

3.80%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

3.80%

+4.16%

GDEC vs. AJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDEC vs. AJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDEC nor AJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GDEC and AJAN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDEC has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to AJAN (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDEC dropped -10.61% vs AJAN's -4.11%.

On 1-year performance, GDEC leads with 16.22% vs 6.25% for AJAN. On fees, AJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDEC has performed better with a 16.22% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GDEC.

GDEC and AJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GDEC and 0.79% for AJAN.

GDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDEC and AJAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer