GDEC vs. DDEC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC).

GDEC and DDEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDEC is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. DDEC is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 18, 2020.

Performance

GDEC vs. DDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GDEC vs. DDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GDEC FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December	-2.12%	12.14%	11.45%	0.46%
DDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December	-1.80%	12.33%	12.26%	0.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDEC achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than DDEC's -1.80% return.

GDEC

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -2.53%
• YTD: -2.12%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DDEC

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: -1.80%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: 11.45%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDEC vs. DDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDEC and DDEC have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

GDEC

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December

DDEC

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December

Return for Risk

GDEC vs. DDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDEC

GDEC Risk / Return Rank: 71
GDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 80

DDEC

DDEC Risk / Return Rank: 85
DDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDEC vs. DDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDEC	DDEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.53	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.22	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.35	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	2.43	-0.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.98	11.60	-2.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDEC vs. DDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the DDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDEC and DDEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDEC	DDEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	1.53	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	1.09	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between GDEC and DDEC is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GDEC vs. DDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDEC nor DDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GDEC vs. DDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.61%, roughly equal to the maximum DDEC drawdown of -10.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDEC and DDEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDEC	DDEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.61%	-10.22%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.19%	-5.46%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.19%	-2.68%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-1.92%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	1.14%	+0.23%

Volatility

GDEC vs. DDEC - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) at 2.85%. This indicates that GDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDEC	DDEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	2.85%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.70%	4.56%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	8.63%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.13%	6.99%	+1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.13%	6.92%	+1.21%