DDEC vs. FDEC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DDEC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December) and FDEC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December) are both Defined Outcome funds from FT Vest. DDEC is passively managed, while FDEC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DDEC returned 8.08%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for FDEC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

DDEC vs. FDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDEC achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than FDEC's 5.40% return.

DDEC

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 6M: 4.05%
• 1Y: 14.63%
• 3Y*: 12.16%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: —

FDEC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 5.03%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 10.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDEC vs. FDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December	4.35%	12.33%	12.26%	16.82%	-6.71%	7.61%	0.95%
FDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December	5.40%	14.82%	14.32%	22.76%	-9.18%	14.12%	1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DDEC and FDEC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2020	0.91

The correlation between DDEC and FDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDEC vs. FDEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDEC	FDEC
Technology	39.0%	39.0%
Financial Services	11.1%	11.1%
Communication Services	10.6%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	9.9%
Healthcare	8.3%	8.3%
Industrials	7.8%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.5%
Energy	3.1%	3.1%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

DDEC vs. FDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDEC

DDEC Risk / Return Rank: 84
DDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FDEC

FDEC Risk / Return Rank: 80
FDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDEC vs. FDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDEC	FDEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.36	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	3.41	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.45	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	3.12	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.42	15.92	+1.50

DDEC vs. FDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FDEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDEC and FDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DDEC vs. FDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, smaller than the maximum FDEC drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDEC and FDEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDEC	FDEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-15.67%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.18%	-5.83%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.40%	-13.04%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.22%	-15.67%	+5.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-1.11%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-2.55%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	1.14%	-0.30%

Volatility

DDEC vs. FDEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) is 1.77%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) has a volatility of 2.26%. This indicates that DDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DDEC	FDEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	2.26%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.64%	6.19%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.91%	7.73%	-1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.06%	11.25%	-4.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.88%	10.99%	-4.11%

DDEC vs. FDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDEC and FDEC have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

DDEC vs. FDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDEC nor FDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDEC and FDEC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, DDEC and FDEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DDEC or FDEC?

FDEC has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to DDEC (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDEC dropped -10.22% vs FDEC's -15.67%.

Which ETF is better, DDEC or FDEC?

On 5-year performance, FDEC leads with 10.20% vs 8.08% for DDEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DDEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DDEC or FDEC?

Over the 5-year period, FDEC has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDEC or FDEC?

DDEC and FDEC have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDEC or FDEC?

DDEC and FDEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.