GDE vs. GDMA
GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) and GDMA (Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GDMA is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Gadsden. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDE returned 46.68%/yr vs 16.91%/yr for GDMA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GDMA.
Performance
GDE vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDE achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than GDMA's 11.18% return.
GDE
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 53.13%
- 3Y*
- 46.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDMA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- —
GDE vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 9.79% | 73.76% | 44.79% | 33.85% | -18.67% |
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 11.18% | 25.29% | 7.44% | 1.72% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDE and GDMA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, GDE and GDMA have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDE vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank
GDE
GDMA
GDE vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDE | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 4.30 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | 11.92 | -4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDE | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.47 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.89 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
GDE vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDE drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than GDMA's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDE and GDMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDE | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -16.66% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.66% | -7.53% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -7.53% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.17% | -1.06% | -10.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.88% | -3.78% | -4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.26% | 2.71% | +4.55% |
Volatility
GDE vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) at 6.18%. This indicates that GDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDE | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 6.18% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | 10.03% | +14.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.39% | 13.12% | +15.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 9.67% | +16.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 10.97% | +15.15% |
GDE vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDE vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison
GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than GDMA's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 3.94% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 2.51% | 2.79% | 2.32% | 4.14% | 1.18% | 2.10% | 0.62% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDE and GDMA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDE has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to GDMA (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDE dropped -32.01% vs GDMA's -16.66%.
On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 46.68% vs 16.91% for GDMA. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDMA has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 46.68% return vs 16.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GDMA.
GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.51% for GDMA.
GDE is categorized as Gold, while GDMA is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Gadsden. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GDE and 0.77% for GDMA.
GDMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDE and GDMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer