GD vs. PXH
GD (General Dynamics Corporation) is a stock, while PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Over the past 10 years, GD returned 12.38%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for PXH. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GD vs. PXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than PXH's 12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GD has outperformed PXH with an annualized return of 12.38%, while PXH has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.
GD
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
PXH
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
GD vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 7.93% | 30.39% | 3.52% | 7.13% | 21.69% | 43.77% | -13.14% | 14.80% | -21.34% | 19.85% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 12.73% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GD and PXH is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GD and PXH has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GD vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank
GD
PXH
GD vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GD | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.85 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 10.21 | -2.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GD vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than PXH's maximum drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and PXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GD | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.67% | -63.63% | -12.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -10.24% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.55% | -17.72% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.55% | -29.59% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.63% | -40.42% | -11.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -3.27% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.60% | -16.84% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 2.85% | +1.38% |
Volatility
GD vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) at 6.41%. This indicates that GD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GD | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 6.41% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.78% | 13.09% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.67% | 15.90% | +5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 17.87% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 20.06% | +2.70% |
Dividends
GD vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison
GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than PXH's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 1.69% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.90% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.49% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GD and PXH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GD has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to PXH (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GD dropped -75.67% vs PXH's -63.63%.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GD and PXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer