GD vs. AGG
GD (General Dynamics Corporation) is a stock, while AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, GD returned 11.59%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for AGG. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GD vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GD has outperformed AGG with an annualized return of 11.59%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.
GD
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
AGG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
GD vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 2.13% | 30.39% | 3.52% | 7.13% | 21.69% | 43.77% | -13.14% | 14.80% | -21.34% | 19.85% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.08% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GD and AGG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2003 | -0.13 |
The correlation between GD and AGG shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GD vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank
GD
AGG
GD vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GD | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.81 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | 5.44 | +0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GD | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | -0.00 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.28 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
GD vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and AGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GD | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.67% | -18.43% | -57.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -2.76% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.55% | -6.11% | -16.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.55% | -17.82% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.63% | -18.43% | -33.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -2.47% | -4.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.61% | -2.71% | -12.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 0.92% | +3.27% |
Volatility
GD vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.29%. This indicates that GD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GD | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 1.29% | +4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 2.77% | +14.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.02% | 3.80% | +17.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 6.09% | +14.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 5.41% | +17.30% |
Dividends
GD vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than AGG's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 1.79% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.90% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GD and AGG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GD has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to AGG (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GD dropped -75.67% vs AGG's -18.43%.
AGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GD and AGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer