PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCT vs. IAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GCT vs. IAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCT achieves a -12.40% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's -7.10% return.


GCT

1D
-1.21%
1M
2.87%
6M
-17.68%
YTD
-12.40%
1Y
65.75%
3Y*
69.39%
5Y*
10Y*

IAG

1D
-0.97%
1M
-5.08%
6M
-10.98%
YTD
-7.10%
1Y
117.30%
3Y*
78.58%
5Y*
39.12%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCT vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GCT
GigaCloud Technology Inc
-12.40%112.10%1.23%221.53%-70.36%
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
-7.10%219.57%103.95%-1.94%93.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GCT and IAG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022

0.14

The correlation between GCT and IAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GCT:

$1.28B

IAG:

$8.85B

EPS

GCT:

$3.95

IAG:

$1.73

PE Ratio

GCT:

8.71

IAG:

8.87

PEG Ratio

GCT:

0.11

IAG:

0.05

PS Ratio

GCT:

0.94

IAG:

2.62

PB Ratio

GCT:

2.48

IAG:

2.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

GCT:

$1.38B

IAG:

$3.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GCT:

$322.79M

IAG:

$1.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

GCT:

$177.88M

IAG:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCT vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCT
GCT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCT vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCTIAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.06

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

6.68

-2.96

GCT vs. IAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCT Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCT and IAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCT vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCT drawdown since its inception was -91.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCT and IAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCTIAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.11%

-95.55%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.13%

-39.60%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.16%

-39.60%

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.57%

-37.65%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.65%

-56.11%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.75%

18.10%

-1.35%

Volatility

GCT vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) is 12.16%, while IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a volatility of 18.59%. This indicates that GCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCTIAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.16%

18.59%

-6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.94%

50.34%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.57%

62.39%

+15.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

143.64%

60.72%

+82.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.64%

58.63%

+85.01%

Dividends

GCT vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither GCT nor IAG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GCT vs. IAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GigaCloud Technology Inc and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
359.49M
1.03B
(GCT) Total Revenue
(IAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GCT vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GigaCloud Technology Inc and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.9%
55.4%
Portfolio components
GCT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GigaCloud Technology Inc reported a gross profit of 85.85M and revenue of 359.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

GCT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GigaCloud Technology Inc reported an operating income of 42.48M and revenue of 359.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

GCT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GigaCloud Technology Inc reported a net income of 38.12M and revenue of 359.49M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GCT and IAG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAG has higher volatility (18.59%) compared to GCT (12.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCT dropped -91.11% vs IAG's -95.55%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCT and IAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer