GCT vs. IMMR
GCT (GigaCloud Technology Inc) and IMMR (Immersion Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — GCT in Software - Infrastructure, IMMR in Software - Application. Over the past 3 years, GCT returned 69.39%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for IMMR. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GCT vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCT achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than IMMR's 15.09% return.
GCT
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- 31.71%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 108.58%
- 3Y*
- 69.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.17%
IMMR
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 15.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.84M | $22.78M | $27.06M | |
| $6.30M | $4.82M | $4.30M |
GCT vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCT GigaCloud Technology Inc | 11.35% | 112.10% | 1.23% | 221.53% | -70.36% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 15.09% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 38.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCT and IMMR is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GCT and IMMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GCT:
$1.63B
IMMR:
$250.93M
GCT:
$3.95
IMMR:
$0.14
GCT:
11.07
IMMR:
55.32
GCT:
0.14
IMMR:
0.64
GCT:
1.19
IMMR:
0.14
GCT:
3.15
IMMR:
0.84
GCT:
$1.38B
IMMR:
$1.73B
GCT:
$322.79M
IMMR:
$360.34M
GCT:
$177.88M
IMMR:
$78.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCT vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank
GCT
IMMR
GCT vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCT | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.09 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 0.53 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 1.20 | +4.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCT vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCT drawdown since its inception was -91.11%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCT and IMMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCT | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.11% | -98.66% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.13% | -24.77% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.16% | -56.90% | -16.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.56% | -88.14% | +72.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.20% | -88.21% | +33.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.82% | 10.86% | +6.96% |
Volatility
GCT vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) is 12.89%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 19.94%. This indicates that GCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCT | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.89% | 19.94% | -7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.32% | 32.97% | +17.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.74% | 43.91% | +33.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.70% | 46.41% | +96.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.70% | 51.27% | +91.43% |
Dividends
GCT vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison
GCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GCT GigaCloud Technology Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 3.57% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% |
Financials
GCT vs. IMMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GigaCloud Technology Inc and Immersion Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GCT vs. IMMR - Profitability Comparison
GCT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GigaCloud Technology Inc reported a gross profit of 85.85M and revenue of 359.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
IMMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported a gross profit of 73.93M and revenue of 270.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
GCT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GigaCloud Technology Inc reported an operating income of 42.48M and revenue of 359.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
IMMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported an operating income of 147.00K and revenue of 270.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.
GCT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GigaCloud Technology Inc reported a net income of 38.12M and revenue of 359.49M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
IMMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported a net income of 3.73M and revenue of 270.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GCT and IMMR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (19.94%) compared to GCT (12.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCT dropped -91.11% vs IMMR's -98.66%.
GCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCT and IMMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer