PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCT vs. IMMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GCT vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCT achieves a -15.17% return, which is significantly lower than IMMR's -1.42% return.


GCT

1D
-1.94%
1M
-12.75%
YTD
-15.17%
6M
-17.67%
1Y
82.68%
3Y*
62.33%
5Y*
10Y*

IMMR

1D
-1.95%
1M
4.47%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
4.58%
1Y
-11.02%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
-3.03%
10Y*
-0.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCT vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GCT
GigaCloud Technology Inc
-15.17%112.10%1.23%221.53%-70.36%
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
-1.42%-18.30%26.47%3.43%38.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GCT and IMMR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022

0.20

The correlation between GCT and IMMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

GCT:

$1.38B

IMMR:

$1.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GCT:

$322.79M

IMMR:

$409.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

GCT:

$177.88M

IMMR:

$188.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCT vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCT
GCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IMMR
IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCT vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCTIMMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.98

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

-0.36

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

-0.65

+6.32

GCT vs. IMMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the IMMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCT and IMMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCT vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCT drawdown since its inception was -91.11%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCT and IMMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCTIMMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.11%

-98.66%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.13%

-30.86%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.16%

-56.90%

-16.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.68%

-89.84%

+54.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.92%

-88.20%

+32.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.63%

17.03%

-2.40%

Volatility

GCT vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison

GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) has a higher volatility of 14.26% compared to Immersion Corporation (IMMR) at 13.11%. This indicates that GCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCTIMMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.26%

13.11%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.58%

27.42%

+23.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.21%

39.88%

+38.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.54%

45.72%

+98.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.54%

51.07%

+93.47%

Dividends

GCT vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison

GCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%.


PositionTTM202520242023
GCT
GigaCloud Technology Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
3.66%5.59%2.06%3.12%

Financials

GCT vs. IMMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GigaCloud Technology Inc and Immersion Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
359.49M
281.38M
(GCT) Total Revenue
(IMMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GCT and IMMR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCT has higher volatility (14.26%) compared to IMMR (13.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCT dropped -91.11% vs IMMR's -98.66%.

GCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCT and IMMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer