GCSVX vs. NEEGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GCSVX (Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund) and NEEGX (Needham Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, GCSVX returned 3.99%/yr vs 28.18%/yr for NEEGX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GCSVX charges 0.43%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for NEEGX.

Performance

GCSVX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCSVX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 62.10% return.

GCSVX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: -2.68%
• 1Y: -2.91%
• 3Y*: 3.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEEGX

• 1D: 3.85%
• 1M: 10.62%
• YTD: 62.10%
• 6M: 58.93%
• 1Y: 95.38%
• 3Y*: 28.18%
• 5Y*: 14.97%
• 10Y*: 16.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCSVX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GCSVX Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund	-0.98%	-8.94%	14.70%	19.92%	-24.73%	4.24%
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	62.10%	8.76%	14.45%	26.85%	-33.57%	1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GCSVX and NEEGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021	0.79

The correlation between GCSVX and NEEGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GCSVX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCSVX

GCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 2
GCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
GCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
GCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
GCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

NEEGX

NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 92
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCSVX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCSVX	NEEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	3.30	-3.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	3.80	-3.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.50	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	7.19	-7.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.50	23.92	-24.42

GCSVX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCSVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCSVX and NEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCSVX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCSVX drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCSVX and NEEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCSVX	NEEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.50%	-53.60%	+20.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.94%	-13.27%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.07%	-38.66%	+14.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.35%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.02%	0.00%	-17.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.47%	-10.88%	-3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.00%	3.98%	+2.02%

Volatility

GCSVX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) is 4.81%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that GCSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCSVX	NEEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	13.02%	-8.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	23.12%	-10.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.78%	28.88%	-12.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	28.70%	-6.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	25.51%	-3.74%

GCSVX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCSVX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCSVX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

GCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than NEEGX's 4.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCSVX Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund	3.23%	3.20%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	4.67%	7.57%	3.92%	0.00%	1.78%	6.92%	5.73%	11.31%	17.79%	9.70%	4.22%	6.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCSVX and NEEGX in my portfolio?

GCSVX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCSVX or NEEGX?

NEEGX has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to GCSVX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCSVX dropped -33.50% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.