GCSVX vs. CTIGX
GCSVX (Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund) and CTIGX (Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, GCSVX returned 2.48%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for CTIGX. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GCSVX charges 0.43%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CTIGX.
Performance
GCSVX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCSVX achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than CTIGX's 13.72% return.
GCSVX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- -4.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.84%
CTIGX
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GCSVX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCSVX Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund | -2.18% | -8.94% | 14.70% | 19.92% | -24.73% | 4.24% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 13.72% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCSVX and CTIGX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GCSVX and CTIGX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCSVX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank
GCSVX
CTIGX
GCSVX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCSVX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.20 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.90 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 7.98 | -8.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCSVX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCSVX drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum CTIGX drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCSVX and CTIGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCSVX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -46.26% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -16.83% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | -29.30% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.03% | -13.83% | -4.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.54% | -18.30% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 4.00% | +2.12% |
Volatility
GCSVX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) is 3.60%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that GCSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCSVX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 9.62% | -6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 23.84% | -11.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 29.20% | -12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 27.53% | -5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 29.28% | -7.66% |
GCSVX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCSVX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCSVX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison
GCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than CTIGX's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 4.03% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% |
GCSVX Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund | 3.27% | 3.20% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCSVX and CTIGX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTIGX has higher volatility (9.62%) compared to GCSVX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCSVX dropped -33.50% vs CTIGX's -46.26%.
CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCSVX and CTIGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer