PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCSIX vs. SWSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCSIX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCSIX achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than SWSSX's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GCSIX has outperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 13.50%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.20% annualized return.


GCSIX

1D
0.92%
1M
4.81%
YTD
20.38%
6M
19.64%
1Y
45.58%
3Y*
27.76%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
13.50%

SWSSX

1D
0.92%
1M
5.00%
YTD
18.71%
6M
17.43%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCSIX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCSIX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund
20.38%15.66%33.50%19.76%-19.98%23.56%6.95%25.43%-8.82%11.82%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
18.71%12.88%11.57%17.07%-20.43%14.77%20.12%25.63%-11.19%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GCSIX and SWSSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.98

The correlation between GCSIX and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCSIX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCSIX
GCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SWSSX
SWSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SWSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCSIX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCSIXSWSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

3.97

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.30

14.11

+3.19

GCSIX vs. SWSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the SWSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCSIX and SWSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCSIXSWSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.28

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.30

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.47

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.36

0.00

Drawdowns

GCSIX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCSIX drawdown since its inception was -63.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCSIX and SWSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCSIXSWSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.23%

-60.34%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-11.00%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

-27.50%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.97%

-31.93%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

-41.81%

-3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.41%

-10.73%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.09%

-0.31%

Volatility

GCSIX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCSIXSWSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

5.61%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.51%

13.60%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

19.15%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.05%

22.59%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.76%

24.09%

-0.33%

GCSIX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCSIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCSIX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison

GCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than SWSSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCSIX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund
8.75%10.54%25.02%0.75%0.87%30.90%0.50%0.54%6.50%0.27%0.60%0.58%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
1.08%1.29%1.66%1.49%1.32%8.88%2.55%6.12%10.45%5.22%4.10%6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GCSIX and SWSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWSSX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to GCSIX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCSIX dropped -63.23% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.

GCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCSIX and SWSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer