PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCSIX vs. GCIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCSIX vs. GCIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCSIX achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than GCIIX's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, GCSIX has outperformed GCIIX with an annualized return of 13.50%, while GCIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.97% annualized return.


GCSIX

1D
0.92%
1M
4.81%
YTD
20.38%
6M
19.64%
1Y
45.58%
3Y*
27.76%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
13.50%

GCIIX

1D
0.39%
1M
6.07%
YTD
12.60%
6M
15.21%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCSIX vs. GCIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCSIX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund
20.38%15.66%33.50%19.76%-19.98%23.56%6.95%25.43%-8.82%11.82%
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
12.60%40.72%9.65%20.80%-14.91%11.71%7.83%18.52%-15.82%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GCSIX and GCIIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.65

The correlation between GCSIX and GCIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCSIX vs. GCIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCSIX
GCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GCIIX
GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCSIX vs. GCIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCSIXGCIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

1.96

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

2.72

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

2.43

+2.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.30

9.08

+8.22

GCSIX vs. GCIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the GCIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCSIX and GCIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCSIXGCIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.96

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.76

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.66

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.32

+0.05

Drawdowns

GCSIX vs. GCIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCSIX drawdown since its inception was -63.23%, roughly equal to the maximum GCIIX drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCSIX and GCIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCSIXGCIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.23%

-61.08%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-12.33%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

-13.25%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.97%

-30.58%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

-39.85%

-5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.41%

-15.04%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.29%

-0.51%

Volatility

GCSIX vs. GCIIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) at 4.87%. This indicates that GCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCSIXGCIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

4.87%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.51%

12.70%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

15.30%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.05%

16.11%

+6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.76%

16.79%

+6.97%

GCSIX vs. GCIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCSIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than GCIIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCSIX vs. GCIIX - Dividend Comparison

GCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than GCIIX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
6.91%7.78%9.24%2.81%3.94%6.33%1.86%2.46%1.94%1.62%2.51%1.45%
GCSIX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund
8.75%10.54%25.02%0.75%0.87%30.90%0.50%0.54%6.50%0.27%0.60%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCSIX and GCIIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCSIX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to GCIIX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCSIX dropped -63.23% vs GCIIX's -61.08%.

GCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCSIX and GCIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer