PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCP.L vs. VJPN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCP.L vs. VJPN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GCP.L is traded in GBp, while VJPN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VJPN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCP.L achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than VJPN.L's 13.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GCP.L has underperformed VJPN.L with an annualized return of 3.37%, while VJPN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.81% annualized return.


GCP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.83%
6M
17.95%
YTD
16.21%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
3.37%
ALL TIME*
6.08%

VJPN.L

1D
1.07%
1M
-6.37%
6M
7.05%
YTD
13.27%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
8.81%
ALL TIME*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCP.L vs. VJPN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCP.L
GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited
16.21%15.63%7.89%-22.98%0.44%6.30%-11.70%9.93%5.00%11.41%
VJPN.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
13.27%18.06%8.47%13.41%-6.17%1.64%12.22%13.98%-8.92%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GCP.L and VJPN.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013

0.13

The correlation between GCP.L and VJPN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCP.L vs. VJPN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCP.L
GCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VJPN.L
VJPN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VJPN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCP.L vs. VJPN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCP.LVJPN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.93

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

8.97

-5.15

GCP.L vs. VJPN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the VJPN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCP.L and VJPN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCP.L vs. VJPN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than VJPN.L's maximum drawdown of -25.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCP.L and VJPN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCP.LVJPN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-25.21%

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-10.72%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

-13.49%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.22%

-18.34%

-25.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-25.21%

-19.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-6.79%

+5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-5.49%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

3.51%

+1.24%

Volatility

GCP.L vs. VJPN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) is 4.80%, while Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that GCP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VJPN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCP.LVJPN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

6.54%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

15.99%

-4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

19.14%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

15.79%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.66%

15.96%

+4.70%

Dividends

GCP.L vs. VJPN.L - Dividend Comparison

GCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, more than VJPN.L's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCP.L
GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited
8.48%9.41%9.89%9.72%6.86%6.46%6.97%5.77%5.97%5.89%6.18%6.33%
VJPN.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.79%1.90%1.94%1.89%2.16%1.69%1.62%1.86%1.91%1.48%1.51%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCP.L and VJPN.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCP.L and VJPN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer