GCOR vs. OVB
GCOR (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and OVB (Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. GCOR is passively managed, while OVB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GCOR returned -0.24%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for OVB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCOR charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OVB.
Performance
GCOR vs. OVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOR achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than OVB's 2.58% return.
GCOR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
OVB
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 9.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
GCOR vs. OVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.16% | 7.22% | 0.51% | 5.79% | -13.83% | -1.88% | 0.39% |
OVB Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF | 2.58% | 7.72% | 4.03% | 6.89% | -16.96% | 0.71% | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOR and OVB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between GCOR and OVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOR vs. OVB — Risk / Return Rank
GCOR
OVB
GCOR vs. OVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCOR | OVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 3.85 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 12.52 | -7.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCOR | OVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.65 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.10 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.26 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
GCOR vs. OVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOR drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum OVB drawdown of -21.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOR and OVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOR | OVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -21.69% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.49% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.09% | -8.18% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.63% | -21.69% | +3.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -0.37% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -7.04% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.76% | +0.16% |
Volatility
GCOR vs. OVB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) is 1.27%, while Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that GCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOR | OVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.49% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 4.69% | -2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 5.80% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 7.31% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 7.58% | -2.06% |
GCOR vs. OVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than OVB's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCOR vs. OVB - Dividend Comparison
GCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than OVB's 6.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.17% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 3.67% | 2.11% | 0.92% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
OVB Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF | 6.96% | 6.00% | 5.81% | 5.20% | 4.67% | 4.59% | 3.88% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOR and OVB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OVB has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to GCOR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOR dropped -18.94% vs OVB's -21.69%.
On 5-year performance, OVB leads with 0.74% vs -0.24% for GCOR. On fees, GCOR is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OVB has performed better with a 0.74% return vs -0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCOR is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVB.
OVB has the higher dividend yield at 6.96%, compared with 4.17% for GCOR.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for GCOR and 0.79% for OVB.
OVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOR and OVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer