PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCOR vs. OVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCOR vs. OVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCOR achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than OVB's 1.16% return.


GCOR

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.04%
6M
-0.54%
YTD
-0.45%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.61%

OVB

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.21%
6M
0.30%
YTD
1.16%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.91M$2.66M$3.19M
$364.42K$272.74K$267.23K

GCOR vs. OVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GCOR
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.45%7.22%0.51%5.79%-13.83%-1.88%0.50%
OVB
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF
1.16%7.72%4.03%6.89%-16.96%0.71%1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOR and OVB is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020

0.81

The correlation between GCOR and OVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCOR vs. OVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCOR
GCOR Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

OVB
OVB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
OVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
OVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCOR vs. OVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCOROVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.15

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.82

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

5.13

-3.33

GCOR vs. OVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the OVB Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOR and OVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCOR vs. OVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOR drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum OVB drawdown of -21.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOR and OVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCOROVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-21.69%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.49%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.09%

-6.99%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.45%

-21.69%

+3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-1.75%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-6.89%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

0.88%

+0.25%

Volatility

GCOR vs. OVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) is 1.05%, while Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that GCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCOROVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.58%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

4.01%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

5.86%

-2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.82%

7.37%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

7.55%

-2.07%

GCOR vs. OVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCOR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than OVB's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCOR vs. OVB - Dividend Comparison

GCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than OVB's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GCOR
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.23%4.03%4.36%3.67%2.11%0.92%0.24%0.00%
OVB
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF
6.62%6.00%5.81%5.20%4.67%4.59%3.88%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCOR and OVB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVB has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to GCOR (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOR dropped -18.94% vs OVB's -21.69%.

On 5-year performance, OVB leads with -0.10% vs -0.73% for GCOR. On fees, GCOR is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVB has performed better with a -0.10% return vs -0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GCOR is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVB.

OVB has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 4.23% for GCOR.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for GCOR and 0.79% for OVB.

OVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCOR and OVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer