GCGIX vs. GLPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX).
GCGIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on May 1, 1997. GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013.
Performance
GCGIX vs. GLPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCGIX vs. GLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund | -14.32% | 15.51% | 53.44% | 37.56% | -29.62% | 29.10% | 32.21% | 29.70% | -4.58% | 29.75% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.94% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCGIX achieves a -14.32% return, which is significantly lower than GLPIX's 16.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GCGIX has outperformed GLPIX with an annualized return of 15.72%, while GLPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.
GCGIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -14.32%
- 6M
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- 12.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
GLPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCGIX vs. GLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCGIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than GLPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCGIX vs. GLPIX — Risk / Return Rank
GCGIX
GLPIX
GCGIX vs. GLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCGIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.87 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.18 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 0.96 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 2.41 | -0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCGIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.87 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.20 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.40 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.19 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCGIX and GLPIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GCGIX vs. GLPIX - Dividend Comparison
GCGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than GLPIX's 6.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund | 8.75% | 7.50% | 23.16% | 7.08% | 19.27% | 42.43% | 9.71% | 4.02% | 10.10% | 4.76% | 0.76% | 0.87% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.21% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
Drawdowns
GCGIX vs. GLPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCGIX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, smaller than the maximum GLPIX drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCGIX and GLPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCGIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.78% | -75.98% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.25% | -13.62% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.57% | -20.89% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.94% | -70.48% | +37.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.25% | -1.00% | -16.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -23.44% | +2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 5.41% | -0.35% |
Volatility
GCGIX vs. GLPIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) at 3.17%. This indicates that GCGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCGIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 3.17% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 7.52% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 15.45% | +7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 19.22% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 26.09% | -4.61% |