GCGIX vs. GAPAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GCGIX (Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund) and GAPAX (Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - GCGIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GAPAX is a Global Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, GCGIX returned 18.09%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for GAPAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCGIX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for GAPAX.

Performance

GCGIX vs. GAPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCGIX achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than GAPAX's 12.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GCGIX has outperformed GAPAX with an annualized return of 18.09%, while GAPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.17% annualized return.

GCGIX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 28.63%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: 18.09%

GAPAX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 13.73%
• 1Y: 30.65%
• 3Y*: 22.83%
• 5Y*: 11.89%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCGIX vs. GAPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund	6.18%	15.51%	53.44%	37.56%	-29.62%	29.10%	32.21%	29.70%	-4.58%	29.75%
GAPAX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A	12.72%	21.27%	24.08%	20.25%	-19.30%	20.10%	13.19%	31.33%	-11.39%	25.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GCGIX and GAPAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998	0.88

The correlation between GCGIX and GAPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCGIX vs. GAPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCGIX

GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 24
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

GAPAX

GAPAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
GAPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
GAPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GAPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
GAPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GAPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCGIX vs. GAPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCGIX	GAPAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.39	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	3.26	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.43	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	3.04	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	13.53	-8.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCGIX vs. GAPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the GAPAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCGIX and GAPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCGIX	GAPAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	2.39	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.70	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.73	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.40	+0.06

Drawdowns

GCGIX vs. GAPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCGIX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, which is greater than GAPAX's maximum drawdown of -58.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCGIX and GAPAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCGIX	GAPAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.78%	-58.88%	-6.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.25%	-10.28%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.10%	-18.34%	-6.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.57%	-31.13%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.94%	-36.31%	+3.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	0.00%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.82%	-11.83%	-8.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	2.30%	+2.95%

Volatility

GCGIX vs. GAPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) is 3.25%, while Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that GCGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCGIX	GAPAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	3.85%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	10.37%	+1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.66%	13.10%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.23%	17.04%	+5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.55%	18.00%	+3.55%

GCGIX vs. GAPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCGIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than GAPAX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCGIX vs. GAPAX - Dividend Comparison

GCGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, less than GAPAX's 12.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAPAX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A	12.82%	14.45%	14.69%	5.01%	6.35%	12.40%	2.34%	9.86%	2.64%	1.96%	1.16%	0.97%
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund	7.06%	7.50%	23.16%	7.08%	19.27%	42.43%	9.71%	4.02%	10.10%	4.76%	0.76%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCGIX and GAPAX in my portfolio?

GCGIX and GAPAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCGIX or GAPAX?

GAPAX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to GCGIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCGIX dropped -65.78% vs GAPAX's -58.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.