PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCCIX vs. RYMEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCCIX vs. RYMEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than RYMEX's 36.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GCCIX has underperformed RYMEX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while RYMEX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.56% annualized return.


GCCIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.07%
6M
9.10%
YTD
16.87%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
6.18%
ALL TIME*
-3.39%

RYMEX

1D
-0.70%
1M
12.31%
6M
24.02%
YTD
36.88%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
8.56%
ALL TIME*
-3.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GCCIX vs. RYMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
16.87%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-14.89%4.31%
RYMEX
Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund
36.88%4.70%8.24%-6.14%23.72%39.03%-22.99%15.48%-14.96%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and RYMEX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.90

The correlation between GCCIX and RYMEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCCIX vs. RYMEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RYMEX
RYMEX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RYMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCCIX vs. RYMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCCIXRYMEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.97

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

6.26

+0.83

GCCIX vs. RYMEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the RYMEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and RYMEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. RYMEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, roughly equal to the maximum RYMEX drawdown of -91.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and RYMEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCIXRYMEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.80%

-91.81%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-18.68%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.50%

-18.68%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.78%

-30.45%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.76%

-59.20%

+1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.04%

-66.55%

-4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.43%

-66.07%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

5.92%

-2.07%

Volatility

GCCIX vs. RYMEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 5.00%, while Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCCIXRYMEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

8.28%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

23.23%

-10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

25.13%

-10.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

23.10%

-4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

22.37%

-2.48%

GCCIX vs. RYMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMEX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCCIX vs. RYMEX - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.11%, more than RYMEX's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
14.11%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%
RYMEX
Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund
1.74%2.38%0.00%4.98%17.15%2.97%109.50%0.74%44.23%1.49%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCCIX and RYMEX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYMEX has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to GCCIX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCIX dropped -90.80% vs RYMEX's -91.81%.

GCCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCCIX and RYMEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer