GCCIX vs. PQCMX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GCCIX (Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund) and PQCMX (PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 5 years, GCCIX returned 8.43%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for PQCMX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCCIX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PQCMX.

Performance

GCCIX vs. PQCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than PQCMX's 17.72% return.

GCCIX

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -8.85%
• YTD: 8.08%
• 6M: 6.76%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: 9.90%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 4.26%

PQCMX

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: -10.42%
• YTD: 17.72%
• 6M: 16.05%
• 1Y: 28.31%
• 3Y*: 11.82%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCIX vs. PQCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund	8.08%	15.45%	5.92%	-9.65%	15.70%	33.42%	-23.01%	16.75%	-14.89%	4.31%
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund	17.72%	13.62%	5.09%	-8.67%	19.10%	27.81%	-1.13%	8.78%	-12.07%	2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and PQCMX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.89

The correlation between GCCIX and PQCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCCIX vs. PQCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCIX

GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 26
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

PQCMX

PQCMX Risk / Return Rank: 43
PQCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PQCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PQCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PQCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PQCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCIX vs. PQCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCCIX	PQCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.63	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.17	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.97	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	8.82	-2.87

GCCIX vs. PQCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the PQCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and PQCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. PQCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than PQCMX's maximum drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and PQCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCCIX	PQCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.80%	-33.00%	-57.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.50%	-14.27%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.50%	-14.27%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.78%	-26.78%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.22%	-14.27%	-58.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.42%	-11.80%	-57.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	3.17%	-0.18%

Volatility

GCCIX vs. PQCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 3.65%, while PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCCIX	PQCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	4.06%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.44%	15.45%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.49%	17.39%	-2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	17.05%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	15.19%	+4.77%

GCCIX vs. PQCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PQCMX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCCIX vs. PQCMX - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, more than PQCMX's 6.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund	14.88%	16.09%	4.08%	4.20%	10.41%	16.46%	0.36%	10.81%	1.47%	5.88%	0.84%	0.36%
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund	6.87%	8.09%	4.14%	3.93%	31.36%	47.61%	0.00%	1.02%	3.02%	1.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCCIX and PQCMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GCCIX and PQCMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GCCIX or PQCMX?

PQCMX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to GCCIX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCIX dropped -90.80% vs PQCMX's -33.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.